- Shapour Fereydouni
 - - Department of Educational Psychology, College of Humanity, Islamic Azad University, Gachsaran, Iran
- Bentolhoda Fereydouni
- - Department of Biology, College of Sciences, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran
- Hamideh Solimani
- - Department of Special children, College of Humanity, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran
Received: 10/8/2008 Accepted: 3/11/2009 - Publisher : Avicenna Research Institute |
|
| Related Articles |
|
| Other Format |
|
|
|
Abstract
Introduction: Oocyte donation is an infertility treatment method in women undergoing cancer treatment, in premature ovarian failure, and menopause or in women who are known carriers for a serious autosomal recessive or X-linked disorder. Recipients of donated oocytes should have intact uterus to support embryo implantation and normal ongoing pregnancy. The objectives of this study were to evaluate attitude of male and female subjects towards oocyte donation and factors affecting these variables such as gender and education.Materials and Methods: This descriptive-correlative study was carried out in Shiraz, Iran, during spring 2008. The cases included 206 subjects (102 females and 104 males), single and married, with and without offspring and fertile and infertile subjects who filled a researcher-devised questionnaire, including questions on demography, attitude toward oocyte donation and conditions in which they might consider this kind of assisted treatment.Results: There were no statistically significant relationships between gender and attitude towards infertility treatment by oocyte donation. There was a relationship between attitude regarding oocyte donation and educational levels of the participants. There were significant differences between female and male subjects regarding medical conditions and conditions requiring this kind of assisted treatment (p<0.01 ); in conditions with female infertility, female subjects were more open to accept the procedure than men and men were reported to be more against any kind of treatment under any circumstances. there were no differences between women and men in cases of infertility due to age, parenting a disabled child or presence of inherited medical conditions in the family.conclusion: regarding the need for oocyte donation in some types of infertility, and the need to submit to the method by both couples, health centers should prepare the ground for proper consultations to provide correct information on the procedure and its legal aspects to help them accept or reject the method.< pan>
Keywords:
Attitude, Education, Female infertility, Menopause, Oocyte donation, Premature ovarian failure To cite this article:References
- Steptoe PC, Edwards RG. Birth after the reimplantation of a human embryo. Lancet. 1978;2(8085):366. [PubMed]
- Klein J, Sauer MV. Oocyte donation. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2002;16(3):277-91. Review. [PubMed]
- Lutjen P, Trounson A, Leeton J, Findlay J, Wood C, Renou P. The establishment and maintenance of preg-nancy using in vitro fertilization and embryo donation in a patient with primary ovarian failure. Nature. 1984; 307(5947):174-5. [PubMed]
- Stolwijk AM, Zielhuis GA, Sauer MV, Hamilton CJ, Paulson RJ. The impact of the woman s age on the success of standard and donor in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 1997;67(4):702-10. [PubMed]
- Coulam CB, Adamson SC, Annegers JF. Incidence of premature ovarian failure. Obstet Gynecol. 1986;67(4): 604-6. [PubMed]
- Coulam CB. Premature gonadal failure. Fertil Steril. 1982;38(6):645-55. [PubMed]
- Rosenwaks Z. Donor eggs: their application in modern reproductive technologies. Fertil Steril. 1987;47(6): 895-909. [PubMed]
- Cohen MA, Lindheim SR, Sauer MV. Donor age is paramount to success in oocyte donation. Hum Reprod. 1999;14(11):2755-8. [PubMed]
- Sauer MV, editor. Principles of oocyte and embryo donation. 1th ed. Vol. 5, Genetic aspects of donor selection. New York: Springer. 1998. 53 p.
- Baird PA, Anderson TW, Newcombe HB, Lowry RB. Genetic disorders in children and young adults: a population study. Am J Hum Genet. 1988;42(5):677-93. [PubMed]
- Abbasi Shavazi MJ, Razeghi Nasrabad HB, Behjati Ardakani Z, Akhondi MM. [Attitudes of infertile women towards gamete donation: a case study in Tehran]. J Reprod Infertil. 2006;7(2):139-48. Persian.
- Inhorn MC. Middle Eastern masculinities in the age of new reproductive technologies: male infertility and stigma in Egypt and Lebanon. Med Anthropol Q. 2004; 18(2):162-82. [PubMed]
- Svanberg AS, Lampic C, Bergh T, Lundkvist O. Pub-lic opinion regarding oocyte donation in Sweden. Hum Reprod. 2003;18(5):1107-14. [PubMed]
- Kazem R, Thompson LA, Hamilton MP, Templeton A. Current attitudes towards egg donation among men and women. Hum Reprod. 1995;10(6):1543-8. [PubMed]
- Lessor R, Reitz K, Balmaceda J, Asch R. A survey of public attitudes toward oocyte donation between sis-ters. Hum Reprod. 1990;5(7):889-92. [PubMed]
- Sheibani S. [Whither Kinship? New assisted reproduc-tion technology practices, Authoritative Knowledge and Relatedness case: studies from Iran]. Payesh. 2007; 7(4):299-306. Persian. [Abstract]
- Diamond R, Kezur D, Meyers M. Couple therapy for infertility. 1th ed?. New York: Guilford Press; 1999. 237 p.
- Chandra PS, Chaturvedi SK, Isaac MK, et al. Marital life among infertile spouse, the wife s perspective and its implication in therapy. Fam Ther. 1991;18:145-54.
- Golombok S, Fivush R. Gender development. 1th ed. New York?: Cambridge University Press; 1994. 275 p.