JRI 
Vol. 25, Issue 3, / July-September 2024
(Original Article, pages 219-223)

Elahe Afshari
- Endometriosis Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Roya Derakhshan
1- Endometriosis Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
2- Department of Artificial Intelligence, Smart University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Shahla Chaichian Corresponding Author
- Endometriosis Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Seyed Reza Saadat Mostafavi
- Department of Radiology, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Shima Ghafourian Noroozi
- Department of Radiology, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Samaneh Rokhgireh
- Endometriosis Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Abolfazl Mehdizadehkashi
- Endometriosis Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Babak Sabet
1- Department of Artificial Intelligence, Smart University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
2- Faculty of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Mohanna Khandan
1- Student Research Committee, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran
2- USERN Office, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran

Received: 4/25/2024 Accepted: 9/22/2024 - Publisher : Avicenna Research Institute

Related Articles

 

Other Format

 


Abstract

Background: Endometriosis is a gynecologic disorder which causes dysmenor-rhea and infertility. Early diagnosis of endometriosis can help prevent the ne-cessity for invasive diagnostic procedures. Medical imaging has been widely utilized to diagnose various diseases without the need for invasive procedures. The purpose of this study was to investigate the cervical length in women with endometriosis.
Methods: In this case-control study, the case group consisted of nulliparous women with endometriosis, while the control group comprised nulliparous women without endometriosis. A total of 42 individuals were included in each group. Cervical length was measured using transvaginal ultrasound from the external os to the internal os. The patients in the case group underwent laparoscopy to confirm the diagnosis. Pearson chi-square test and Fisher’s exact test were employed to compare categorical variables with a p<0.05 considered statistically significant.
Results: In both groups, there were no notable variations in any of the demographic characteristics. However, the severity of dysmenorrhea was significantly different between the two groups (p=0.01). The average diameter of the mediolateral cervix (29.48±6.2 and 27.14±3.8) was statistically significant between the patient group and control group, respectively (p=0.04). The mediolateral width may have a positive predictive effect on the presence of endometriosis, while cervical length appears to have a protective effect against endometriosis.
Conclusion: Demographic data do not predict endometriosis. This study sug-gests that mediolateral width in transvaginal sonography can serve as a minimal-ly invasive diagnostic tool for endometriosis, showing correlation with endome-triosis symptoms like dysmenorrhea and dyspareunia.



Keywords: Cervical length measurement, Endometrial thickness, Endometriosis


To cite this article:


Full Text

Introduction
Endometriosis is a benign disease of women that causes pelvic pain, painful menstruation, and infertility (1). It is characterized by the growth of endometrial tissue outside the uterus. The ectopic cells outside the uterus act like normal endometrial tissue throughout the menstrual cycle (2). Ovaries, peritoneal cavity, and uterovesical pouch are the primary sites for the growth of ectopic endometrial tissue; however, there are rare locations, including the thorax, in which endometrial tissue grows (3). Endometriosis can affect up to 10% of women in the reproductive age, which indicates about 170 million women worldwide (4). Various methods with different sensitivities are utilized for endometriosis diagnosis, including clinical examinations, laparoscopy, imaging modalities, and laboratory tests (5). Since severe pain caused by endometriosis reduces the quality of life of patients, early diagnosis of this disease requires significant attention (6). Laparoscopy is a surgical approach for diagnosing endometriosis. Although laparoscopy is a gold standard method for endometriosis diagnosis, it is not always recommended as a first line diagnostic method (7). Medical imaging modalities, such as ultrasonography, are utilized for a less invasive assessment of endometriosis. Ultrasonographic diagnosis is often preferred over other methods due to its availability and the absence of ionizing radiation (8).
Therefore, the present study was conducted with the aim of investigating the length of the cervix and the thickness of the endometrium in women with endometriosis who were referred to the Endometriosis Clinic of Rasoul Akram Hospital in Tehran, Iran from 2018-2021.

Methods
In this case-control study, nulliparous women with and without endometriosis (diagnosed based on vaginal ultrasound) were divided into case and control groups. Before starting the study, an informed consent was obtained from the patients. The inclusion criteria consisted of healthy nulligravid Iranian women. Total number of 42 women with endometriosis were included in the case group and 42 women without endometriosis were included in the control group.
In both the case and control groups, patients underwent vaginal ultrasound, and the length and width of the cervix, the mediolateral diameter, and the thickness of the endometrium were all measured. Cervical length was meticulously evaluated using the Philips Affiniti 70 ultrasound system (software version 5.0.X; Philips, Austria) in conjunction with a RIC 5-9 MHz transvaginal probe, following bladder emptying and obtaining patient consent. Transvaginal ultrasound (TVS) was performed using a high-frequency probe of 6-7.5 MHz in the vagina (Figures 1 and 2).
The patients of the case group underwent laparoscopy and the diagnosis was confirmed. The collected information was recorded in the registration form. Both case and control groups were matched in terms of age, weight, body mass index, age at menarche, and length of menstrual cycle. Demographic information of patients including BMI, age at menarche, height, weight, and level of education was recorded. Menstrual pain of patients was determined and recorded using visual analogue scale (VAS). VAS is a method of measuring pain using a ten-point Likert scale, ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (extreme pain).
The length of the cervix was measured by a radiologist using transvaginal or rectal ultrasound, from the external os to the internal os. All ultrasounds were performed on days 4 to 10 of the menstrual cycle.
Data analysis utilized descriptive statistical methods, including mean and standard deviation. The chi-square test was applied to compare the two groups when the necessary conditions were met; otherwise, Fisher's exact test was applied. Pearson’s correlation test was conducted to investigate the relationship between cervical length, mediolateral width, and anteroposterior length of the cervix in ultrasound imaging, along with dysmenorrhea and dyspareunia. All analyses were performed using SPSS version 22 (IBM, USA). The study was conducted in accordance with ethical guidelines, as approved by the Institutional Review Board (IR.IUMS.REC.1398.066).

Results
A total of 84 patients were included in this study. Demographic characteristics of the patients including BMI, age, age at menarche, height, weight and level of education are shown in table 1. The average age at menarche in the control and case groups was 12.66±1.99 and 12.32±2.8 years, respectively. There was no significant difference in any of the demographic characteristics in both case and control groups (Table 1).
All patients in the case group were diagnosed with stage 3 and 4 endometrioses. In general, 23 patients in the case group (54.8%) and 27 (62.8%) patients in the control group had no dyspareunia (p=0.37). In the case group, 57% reported experiencing menstrual pain frequently or consistently, whereas 59.5% of participants in the control group indicated that they never or sometimes experienced menstrual pain. The intensity of dysmenorrhea, as measured by VAS, was 6.3±2.3 in the case group and 4.66±3.2 in the control group (p=0.01). The menstrual cycle duration was 21 to 35 days in 88.1% of the cases and 65.1% of the controls, showing significant relationship between the groups (p=0.01).
Changes of the cervical parameters in case and control groups are presented in table 2. The thickness of the endometrium in the case and control groups were 2.23±5.71 mm and 2.23±6.2 mm, respectively with no statistically significant difference (p=0.37). The anteroposterior length in the cervix was 22.54±4.36 mm in the case group and 23.33±5.1 mm in the control group (p=0.45). The average diameter of the mediolateral width (29.48±6.2 and 27.14±3.8) between the two groups was statistically significant in the endometriosis patient group and the control group, respectively (p=0.04). Cervical length was 32.39±4.26 mm in the case group and 34.19±6.5 mm in the control group, which was not statistically significant (p=0.14). The correlation between cervical length and mediolateral width measured by ultrasound was significant (r=0.4, p=0.01).
In analyzing the predictive variables related to cervical characteristics, including cervical length, mediolateral width, and posterolateral width, age and BMI of the patients were considered in predicting endometriosis. Using backward multivariate regression model that achieved an accuracy of 70%, it was found that mediolateral width had a significant directional predictive effect on endometriosis, whereas cervical length demonstrated a protective effect against the condition (Table 3).

Discussion
The purpose of this study was to investigate the length of the cervix and the thickness of the endometrium in women with endometriosis referred to the Endometriosis Clinic of Rasoul Akram Hospital in Tehran, Iran from 2018-2021. The findings of this study may enhance the diagnosis of endometriosis and contribute to a reduction in disease morbidity. It was found that demographic findings are not different in people with endometriosis and without endometriosis. The only parameter for cervical measurement obtained via transvaginal ultrasound that demonstrates a significant difference between the two groups is the mediolateral width. Also, there is a correlation between all the ultrasound indices in measuring the cervix with the indices of dysmenorrhea and dyspareunia.
Transvaginal ultrasonography is the primary method for the diagnosis of endometriosis. Ultrasonographic evaluation of cervical and endometrial indices can provide dynamic data and additional information that is not easily obtained through other imaging modalities (9).
Several studies have shown that age at menarche (10, 11), the length of menstrual cycle (12), and BMI (13) are not risk factors for endometriosis. Similarly, in the present study, there was no significant difference in age at menarche, BMI, and length of menstrual cycle in two groups, namely individuals with endometriosis and those who were healthy.
A study by Selçuk et al. (2012) demonstrated that women with endometriosis had longer menstrual cycle lengths and cervical lengths. The researchers noted that the relationship between endometriosis and demographic characteristics such as age, gravidity, parity, body mass index, menstrual cycle length, and age at menarche remains controversial. Longer cervix and thicker myometrium may be important in the etiopathology of endometriosis (14).
Research has indicated that early stages of endometriosis are often associated with junctional zone alterations in the uterus, which serve as a useful indirect marker for diagnosing the condition. According to the report of the American Society of Reproductive Medicine (ASRM), there is a strong relationship between changes in the junctional zone of the uterus and the presence of endometriosis. These findings can be obtained from ultrasonography (15, 16).
Median cervical length was greater in the control group in comparison with case group but the difference was not significant. However, in a study by Selçuk et al. (14), it was shown that the difference between the groups was significant and the endometriosis patients had longer cervical length. The difference between the groups may be attributed to the gravidity and parity of the patients in Selçuk et al.’s study, whereas our study included only nulligravid patients. The data regarding the correlation between cervical indices and endometriosis diagnosis and prognosis are quite limited. Therefore, the results of this study cannot be easily compared to the previous research.
Based on the findings of this study, mediolateral width may have a positive predictive effect on presence of endometriosis, while cervical length appears to have a protective effect against endometriosis. Further investigations with a larger sample size are required to determine the accuracy of the findings.

Conclusion
Our study’s findings suggest that mediolateral width in transvaginal ultrasonography can serve as a minimally invasive diagnostic tool for endometriosis. It shows a correlation with endometriosis symptoms, including dysmenorrhea and dyspareunia. Moreover, mediolateral width may have a positive predictive value for the presence of endometriosis. However, further investigations with a larger sample size are required to determine the accuracy of this study’s findings.

Conflict of Interest
Authors declare no conflict of interest.




Figures, Charts, Tables

High Resolution
Figure 1. Transverse view

Figure 1. Transverse view



High Resolution
Figure 2. Longitudinal view (anteroposterior length: CD and cervical length: AB)

Figure 2. Longitudinal view (anteroposterior length: CD and cervical length: AB)




Table 1. Demographic characteristics of control and case groups

Table 1. Demographic characteristics of control and case groups




Table 2. Comparison of cervical length parameters in case and control groups
* Millimeters

Table 2. Comparison of cervical length parameters in case and control groups

* Millimeters




Table 3. Variables predicting endometriosis
* Standard error, ** Odds ratio, *** Confidence interval

Table 3. Variables predicting endometriosis

* Standard error, ** Odds ratio, *** Confidence interval



References

  1. Agarwal SK, Chapron C, Giudice LC, Laufer MR, Leyland N, Missmer SA, et al. Clinical diagnosis of endometriosis: a call to action. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019;220(4):354.e1-354.e12.   [PubMed]
  2. Vitale SG, Capriglione S, Peterlunger I, La Rosa VL, Vitagliano A, Noventa M, et al. The role of oxidative stress and membrane transport systems during endometriosis: a fresh look at a busy corner. Oxidative Med Cell Longev. 2018;2018:7924021.   [PubMed]
  3. Davoodi P, J Ghadimi D, Rezaei M, Khazei Tabari MA, Shirani A, Nouri B, et al. Endometriosis and COVID-19: Clinical presentation and quality of life, a systematic review. J Obstet Gynecol Cancer Res. 2023;8(4):315-26.
  4. Della Corte L, Di Filippo C, Gabrielli O, Reppuccia S, La Rosa VL, Ragusa R, et al. The burden of endometriosis on women’s lifespan: a narrative overview on quality of life and psychosocial wellbeing. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(13):4683.   [PubMed]
  5. Benacerraf BR, Groszmann Y. Sonography should be the first imaging examination done to evaluate patients with suspected endometriosis. J Ultrasound Med. 2012;31(4):651-3.   [PubMed]
  6. Tripoli TM, Sato H, Sartori MG, de Araujo FF, Girão MJ, Schor E. Evaluation of quality of life and sexual satisfaction in women suffering from chronic pelvic pain with or without endometriosis. J Sex Med. 2011;8(2):497-503.   [PubMed]
  7. Sherif MF, Badawy ME, Elkholi DG. Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosis of deeply infiltrating endometriosis. Egyptian J Radiol Nuclear Med. 2015;46(1):159-65.
  8. Bagaria SJ, Rasalkar DD, Paunipagar BK. Imaging tools for endometriosis: role of ultrasound, MRI and other imaging modalities in diagnosis and planning intervention. Endometriosis Basic Concepts Curr Res Trends. 2012;24:437-47.
  9. Exacoustos C, Zupi E, Piccione E. Ultrasound imaging for ovarian and deep infiltrating endo-metriosis. Semin Reprod Med. 2017;35(1):5-24.   [PubMed]
  10. Marcellin L, Santulli P, Pinzauti S, Bourdon M, Lamau MC, Borghese B, et al. Age at menarche does not correlate with the endometriosis phenotype. PLoS One. 2019;14(7):e0219497.   [PubMed]
  11. Nnoaham KE, Webster P, Kumbang J, Kennedy SH, Zondervan KT. Is early age at menarche a risk factor for endometriosis? a systematic review and meta-analysis of case-control studies. Fertil Steril. 2012;98(3):702-12.e6.   [PubMed]
  12. Waller KG, Shaw RW. Risk factors for endo-metriosis: menstrual and life-style characteristics. Med Principles Pract. 1998;7(2):127-33.
  13. Tang Y, Zhao M, Lin L, Gao Y, Chen GQ, Chen S, et al. Is body mass index associated with the incidence of endometriosis and the severity of dysmenorrhoea: a case–control study in China? BMJ Open. 2020;10(9):e037095.   [PubMed]
  14. Selçuk A, Bayraktar M, Gürbüz A, Alkan A, Sadiye E. Uterine junctional zone thickness, cervical length and bioelectrical impedance analysis of body composition in women with endometriosis. Balkan Med J. 2012;29(4):410-3.   [PubMed]
  15. Tajeran Gh, Derakhshan R, Jayervand F, Rahimi M, Hajari P, Hashemi N. The predictive value of transvaginal cervical length and cervical angle ultrasonography in term delivery outcomes: a cohort study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2024;37(1):2406344.   [PubMed]
  16. Tosti C, Zupi E, Exacoustos C. Could the uterine junctional zone be used to identify early-stage endometriosis in women? Womens Health (Lond). 2014;10(3):225-7.   [PubMed]

COPE
SID
NLM
AJMB
IJBMLE
IJBMLE

Home | About Us | Current Issue | Past Issues | Submit a Manuscript | Instructions for Authors | Subscribe | Search | Contact Us

"Journal of Reproduction & Infertility" is owned, published, and managed by Avicenna Research Institute .
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution –NonCommercial 4.0 International License which allows users to read, copy, distribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly.

Journal of Reproductoin and Infertility (JRI) is a member of COMMITTEE ON PUBLICATION ETHICS . Verify here .

©2024 - eISSN : 2251-676X, ISSN : 2228-5482, For any comments and questions please contact us.